It comes down to how much you think your better than the next person, how your life means more then theirs. It's selfish people who think they are kings of the world who will always be divided from the sane people. #1 Stop sending our kids over there without the right equipment and when they come home with their blown up bodies how about helping them out instead of taking away their benefits? How about giving some respect to the families who lost members in this invasion? Like I said, I could totally take this person apart but, time is precious to me and I will not give her any.
May peace be inside all of us,
Cindy
Leftist leadership: A danger to America
This past week, liberals proved, again, that they are still unfit to lead this nation.
Our nation is at war. An Islamic terrorist network that wants to topple the governments of Western nations and impose a strict code of Islamic fundamentalism across the globe has repeatedly attacked our nation and our people.
But the left just doesn't get this. They are blinded by their own dark view of America: that our nation is the greatest threat to the world.
I've spent the past few weeks personally involved in a number of fronts where the "Blame America First" crowd has exposed their foolishness, and I cannot help but shake my head in disbelief at how absolutely misguided these folks have become.
Déjà vu
We've been here before, during the Cold War, when the left howled about the supposed evilness of America under the rule of that warmongering Republican, Ronald Reagan. The political left and many of their allies in the news media viewed Reagan as a reckless cowboy who was just dying to press the nuclear missile trigger. Of course, Reagan was right and the liberals were wrong, but that's not a lesson the left took with them.
Today, the editors of the New York Times and other liberal newspapers see President Bush as an even greater evil than Reagan was. Unable to persuade the American public to vote for the nominee from the "Blame America First" party (John Kerry), the Times has decided that they will do the work the American voters failed to do the first time – STOP THE REPUBLICANS.
Twice now, the Times has decided to report to America's enemies the nature of our anti-terrorist programs, complete with specific information about how the programs were operating and what weak links existed in the programs that might be exploited by those who wished to bring an end to their existence.
These actions are treasonous by any definition, but the New York Times is now acting with indignation that anyone should question or criticize them.
New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof wrote a July Fourth column attacking me for my calls for an investigation and prosecution of Times editor Bill Keller. That's liberal chutzpah for you: Defend the criminal and attack the eyewitness!
Mr. Keller and his defenders have offered a litany of lame excuses including the fact that al-Qaida already knew in a general sense what we were doing to monitor them, so reporting on the specifics wasn't too treasonous. It was just a little treasonous.
Fine, maybe then if any of the people at the New York Times are prosecuted and convicted of treason, they can receive just a little bit of the death penalty for betraying their nation.
Peace or pieces?
With the debate still raging about how little or how much the Times was guilty of treason, the Stalinist despot in North Korea, Kim Jong-Il, decided to provide Americans with a reminder of what happens when you let liberals lead – even just for a little while.
It was during the party days of the Clinton administration when disgraced former President Jimmy Carter brokered a deal that had the U.S. building nuclear reactors for North Korea and giving them hundreds of millions of dollars worth of oil and food in exchange for a promise from the North Koreans not to develop nuclear missiles and point them at us.
Once again, Jimmy Carter embodied the liberal view that America is the bad guy, and that the bad guys are just good guys who had evil bad-guy paint thrown on them by the mean Republicans. If we could only peel off the false disguise the right-wingers had applied to these tender souls we could see them for the loving, sensitive human beings they really are and feel their pain.
The North Korean government this week showed just how effective this foreign policy of appeasement is, by pointing missiles as us and shooting them.
When I recently launched the campaign to have members of Congress issue a resolution of censure against Jimmy Carter for his destructive actions since leaving office, I was immediately attacked by liberals who said Carter was a leader in the fight for peace.
This week, I was thinking that they got their spelling wrong – Jimmy Carter's efforts helped the North Koreans come one step closer to blowing an American city to pieces.
Confused
Just when I thought the left could not sink any lower this week, could not shame themselves any more than they already had – well, Cindy Sheehan had to go on TV again and open her mouth.
I have so many mixed feelings for Ms. Sheehan. I truly have empathy for her, especially since it is so obvious that her emotional trauma and suffering have rendered her into a state of confusion and disorientation.
However, I also have been an outspoken critic of her political posturing, and teamed up with Marine mom Deborah Johns to lead the "You Don't Speak for Me, Cindy" caravans and bus tours. I think nowadays most Americans have finally figured out that Cindy Sheehan doesn't speak for them, either.
Sheehan is currently engaged in a hunger strike with Al Sharpton, Danny Glover, Sean Penn and others. It's called "Troops Home Fast," and that is what they are doing, giving up food for eight-hour periods and then "rotating" the fast on to someone else to pick up. So you eat three times in a 24-hour day.
In the land of reality, we call that eating three meals a day. In the land of twisted liberal thinking, they call that a hunger strike. Sheehan says she will be going back to Crawford, Texas, in August and to the Capitol Mall again in September.
Might I suggest that Cindy Sheehan take her band of eight-hour fasters and set up permanent residence in Venezuela? This week on MSNBC's Hardball, Sheehan told guest host Norah O'Donnell that she would rather live under Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez than U.S. President George Bush.
Sheehan said, "Hugo Chavez is not a dictator like you introduced him. He's been democratically elected eight times. He is not anti-American; he has helped the poor people of America."
Yeah, uh huh, and North Korea's dictator is really a misunderstood sweet guy, and the terrorists already knew how we tracked them so it doesn't matter if we tell them all of our secrets and …
Well, it just goes on and on, folks. The American left is so far gone from reality that they are an actual danger to our nation. Liberals openly cheer on America's enemies while condemning their own nation and it's government. They leak classified secrets to the enemy. They repeatedly seek to undermine the morale of U.S. troops.
And in a few months, they'll be asking for the votes of the American people so they might take over the government. God help us, so that the public realizes these people cannot be trusted with political power.
AHHHH....AND YET ANOTHER PERSON FILLED WITH HATE AND WILL ALWAYS BE DIVIDED FROM REALITY and might I add...divided from love. Oh thats right, they are better then the rest of us....right?
Is Sheehan fasting or pulling a fast one?
Liberals, appeasers and other America haters at home and abroad can now rejoice: Cindy Sheehan and her rabble rousing group called Codepink: Women for Peace, are going to single handedly force President Bush to withdraw troops from Iraq.
Sheehan, and her strange feminist sisterhood, have recently adopted a plan to join the ranks of Mahatma Gandhi and Cesar Chavez by conducting a hunger strike in order to make a peaceful political statement. The women plan to fast until President Bush pulls US troops out of Iraq.
According to Codepink “hundreds of celebrities, veterans, mothers, and concerned citizens across the country will participate in a rolling fast.” Strikers will include pro-marihuana activist and musician Willie Nelson along with America hating actors, Danny Glover, Sean Penn and Susan Sarandon.
When I first heard the news about Sheehan’s fast I thought I would see some real suffering. You know, something death defying like the time David Blaine sat in a Plexiglas cage on the River Thames in London fasting for 44 days.
Of course, being the weak kneed liberals that they are, Sheehan and her group are not exactly fasting like David Blaine, Mahatma Gandhi or Cesar Chavez by starving themselves for 20 or 30 straight days, but instead making up their own fasting rules. Simply put, they are conducting a rolling fast.
What is a rolling fast? Each person taking part in the Codepink protest will fast for only one day and then pass the fast on to one of his or her liberal friends. This friend will in turn fast for only one day and then pass the fast along to another friend. Sort of like a huge, hunger chain letter, but of course the protester can eat when his or her shift is over.
So why bother? No one really suffers like Gandhi, Chavez or David Blaine. No real political statement will be made. So what is the point?
I also find it ironic that Sheehan announced the plans for her fake hunger strike on Michael Moore’s website. When I read her statement on his site I really hoped Moore would take part in the fast since everyone knows he can afford to lose a few pounds. I’m sure he found out ahead of time that it was actually a “rolling hunger strike” or I doubt if he would have agreed to post her statement on his website in the first place. One day of starvation is all he can take.
Sheehan has been making the rounds on nightly cable news programs this week using up her remaining 15 minutes of fame. In doing so she is once again using her son’s death in Iraq, who was fighting for Iraqi freedom, to make a liberal political statement.
Sheehan is using her son’s death much in the same way John Kerry uses his military service in Vietnam: to gain liberal support. Both Kerry and Sheehan drag their sacred memories through the mud, all in the name of liberalism. They both disgrace the honor of the US military and their own families. I really don’t know how they sleep at night.
Codepink’s rolling fast will continue until September 21, International Peace Day, when activists around the country will initiate a week of nonviolent actions against the war as part of the “Declaration of Peace”. During “Peace Day” liberal activist will undoubtedly hold hands, stare sadly into CNN cameras, and sing peaceful songs, wishing the world’s troubles would just melt away.
If Willie Nelson makes an appearance at the peace rally I’m sure one of the songs will be “Rocky Mountain High” then all the liberals will have a wonderful time.
Sheehan has planned to conduct most of the fast for peace in her favorite ditch outside President Bush’s ranch in Crawford, Texas. She has sued McLennan County over roadside camping and parking bans near the ranch that were installed by the county after here last protest.
In a way I hope she wins the lawsuit and the authorities allow her to once again lay claim to her favorite home away from home. She really deserves her ditch.
I hope conservatives around the county also plan on making a statement this summer in Crawford. My suggestion is to counter the Sheehan’s hunger strike with a “Barbeque for Bush” extravaganza. Conservatives in the Crawford area and from around the country should load up their barbeque grills, drive to Crawford and join Cindy and her friends for a cookout.
In my mind I can almost smell the hamburgers and hotdogs cooking on hundreds of grills surrounding the Sheehan camp, spreading their delicious aroma over the entire area. Maybe some nice person could even offer Cindy and her friends a hotdog or hamburger.
But please, what ever happens: keep the last slice of apple pie for yourself. Cindy would not eat it anyway.
Apple pie is a little too American for her.
Posts
