Thursday, May 25, 2006

Triumph - Allied Forces - 1981


Artist: Triumph
Album: Allied Forces

Song: Ordinary Man



Look in the mirror tell me what do you see
Or can you lie to yourself like you're lyin' to me
Do you fall asleep real easy feelin' justified and right
Or do you wake up feelin' empty in the middle of the night
You want to think you're different, but you know you never can
You're just another ordinary man

Hey politician, can't believe a word you say
Almighty media, whose truth d'you sell today?
Watchdog of justice, who keeps their eye on you?
Con man, song in hand, who you singin' to?
The more I get to see, the less I understand
I'm just another ordinary man

Chorus:
Ordinary man
Comes a time to take a stand

No rest for the wicked - they get it while they can
The preachers and the teachers and your local congressman
Everybody plays the game they played since time began
Lawyers and accountant - your media man

Everybody's talkin' but nothin's gettin' said
You're looking for the truth you better look inside your head
I see the flash of lightnin'
I hear the thunder roll
A hungry knive, a slice of life
It cuts another soul

Power finds a way to those who take a stand
Stand up ordinary man

Once I thought the truth was gonna set me free
But now I feel the chains of its responsibility
I will not be a puppet I cannot play it safe
I'll give myself away with a blind and simple faith
I'm just the same as you I just do the best I can
That's the only answer...for an ordinary man

Chorus
Ordinary man
Comes a time to take a stand

No such thing as easy answers
You play to win and you take your chances

Chorus
Ordinary man
Comes a time to take a stand

Here's to health, here's to wealth
May you never doubt yourself

Chorus
Ordinary man
Comes a time to take a stand

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

Remind Howard who's boss, Sheehan urges

Remind Howard who's boss, Sheehan urges


Activist Cindy Sheehan has arrived in Sydney and wants people to speak out against the war in Iraq.
Renew anti-war stance ... peace activist Cindy Sheehan has arrived in Sydney and she wants people to speak out against the conflict in Iraq. Reuters

A prominent American anti-war campaigner is urging Australians to take to the streets in protest against the Iraq war.

Cindy Sheehan, who has campaigned against the war since the death of her son Casey in Iraq in 2004, is visiting Australia to address a peace conference.

She says Prime Minister John Howard had no mandate to involve Australia in the war, which began in 2003.

"I think Australians, they just need to get out on the streets and they need to say, 'John Howard, you work for us'," Mrs Sheehan said.

"'We want our troops withdrawn and we don't want you to support America.'"

Mrs Sheehan has questioned Mr Howard's friendship with US President George W Bush.

"George Bush isn't even popular in America any more so I don't know why any leaders in any countries who claim to govern their countries with the consent of the people they govern would align themselves closer with George Bush," she said.

Mrs Sheehan rose to prominence in the anti-war movement when she staged a month-long protest outside Mr Bush's Texas ranch last year.

"I was pretty visible and well-known in the progressive peace movement in the United States but not known by mainstream Americans or internationally known until I camped out," she said.

Logic questioned

She says her campaign against the war is motivated by a television address Mr Bush gave.

"[When] 14 Marines were killed one day, George Bush went on the TV and said they died for a noble cause ... and he had to complete the mission to honour their sacrifices," Mrs Sheehan said.

"I wanted to know what noble cause and I wanted him to stop using Casey's name to continue and to justify more killing."

Mrs Sheehan denies she is a "a pin-up girl for the loopy left and for global terrorists", as claimed by an Australian newspaper columnist.

"I believe George Bush is the greatest recruiter for Al Qaeda in Al Qaeda's history," she said.

"You don't kill innocent Iraqi people, you don't fight a war on terror with a war of terror and that's what George Bush is doing and that's what [the Australian] Government is doing in support of George Bush.

"To say I'm a tool of the loopy Left, let me tell you almost 70 per cent of Americans agree with me."

She says her views have prompted death threats but she is not intimidated.

"I found on April 4, 2004 that there's worse things than dying," she said.

"One of the worse things is burying your oldest child.

"The death threats, the personal attacks, they don't bother me because if I can save one life by what I'm doing, it'll be worth it."

Monday, May 22, 2006

Easily Dispensable: Iraq's Children


Easily Dispensable: Iraq's Children


By Dahr Jamail
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Monday 22 May 2006

Cherishing children is the mark of a civilized society.
- Joan Ganz Cooney

If, as I would like to believe, the above quote suggests all children and not merely those born in Western democracies, I am no longer certain that we live in a civilized society.

That women and children suffer the most during times of war is not a new phenomenon. It is a reality as old as war itself. What Rumsfeld, Rice and other war criminals of the Cheney administration prefer to call "collateral damage" translates in English as the inexcusable murder of and other irreparable harm done to women, children and the elderly during any military offensive.

US foreign policy in the Middle East manifests itself most starkly in its impact on the children of Iraq. It is they who continue to pay with their lives and futures for the brutal follies of our administration. Starvation under sanctions, and death and suffering during war and occupation are their lot. Since the beginning of the occupation, Iraqi children have been affected worst by the violence generated by the occupying forces and the freedom fighters.

While I had witnessed several instances of this from the time of my first trip to Iraq in November 2003, I was shaken by a close encounter with it, a year later, in November 2004.

In a major Baghdad hospital, 12-year-old Fatima Harouz lay in her bed, dazed, amidst a crowded hospital room. She limply waved her bruised arm at the flies that buzzed over the bed. Her shins, shattered by bullets when American soldiers fired through the front door of her house, were both covered in casts. Small plastic drainage bags filled with red fluid sat upon her abdomen, where she had taken shrapnel from another bullet.

She was from Latifiya, a city just south of Baghdad. Three days before I saw her, soldiers had attacked her home. Her mother, standing with us in the hospital, said, "They attacked our home and there weren't even any resistance fighters in our area." Her brother had been shot and killed, his wife wounded, and their home ransacked by soldiers. "Before they left, they killed all of our chickens," added Fatima's mother, her eyes a mixture of fear, shock and rage. A doctor who was with us as Fatima's mother narrated the story looked at me and sternly asked, "This is the freedom … in their Disney Land are there kids just like this?"

The doctors' anger was mild if we consider the magnitude of suffering that has been inflicted upon the children of Iraq as a direct result of first the US-backed sanctions and then the failed US occupation.

In a report released by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) on May 2nd of this year, one out of three Iraqi children is malnourished and underweight.

The report states that 25% of Iraqi children between the ages of six months and five years old suffer from either acute or chronic malnutrition. In addition, the Integrated Regional Information Network (IRIN) press release on the matter added, "A 2004 Living Conditions Survey indicated a decrease in mortality rates among children under five years old since 1999. However, the results of a September 2005 Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis - commissioned by Iraq's Central Organization for Statistics and Information Technology, the World Food Program and UNICEF - showed worsening conditions since the April 2003 US-led invasion of the country."

Also this month, on May 15th , a news story about the same UN-backed government survey highlighted that "people are struggling to cope three years after US-forces overthrew Saddam Hussein." The report added that "Children are ... major victims of food insecurity," and described the situation as "alarming." The story continued, "A total of four million Iraqis, roughly 15 percent of the population, were in dire need of humanitarian aid including food, up from 11 percent in a 2003 report, the survey of more than 20,000 Iraqi households found.… Decades of conflict and economic sanctions have had serious effects on Iraqis. Their consequences have been rising unemployment, illiteracy and, for some families, the loss of wage earners."

But the hearts of small children are delicate organs. A cruel beginning in this world can twist them into curious shapes.
- Carson McCullers

Iraq's ministries of Health and Planning carried out the survey with support from the UN World Food Program and UNICEF. A spokesman for UNICEF's Iraq Support Center in Amman, Jordan, David Singh, told Reuters that the number of acutely malnourished children in Iraq had more than doubled, from 4% during the last year of Saddam's rule to at least 9% in 2005. He also said, "Until there is a period of relative stability in Iraq we are going to continue to face these kinds of problems." UNICEF's special representative for Iraq, Roger Wright, commenting on the dire effects of the situation, said, "This can irreversibly hamper the young child's optimal mental/cognitive development, not just their physical development."

This past March, an article titled "Garbage Dump Second Home for Iraqi Children" addressed the appalling situation in the northern, Kurdish-controlled Iraqi city of Sulaimaniyah where young children assist their families in searching the city garbage dumps. It said that children as young as seven often accompany their parents to the dumps before school, in order to look for reusable items such as shoes, clothing and electrical equipment which is then resold in order to augment the family income.

This disturbing news is not really news in Baghdad. Back in December 2004 I saw children living with their families in the main dump of the capital city.

Poverty in Iraq has plummeted acutely during the invasion and occupation. Those who were already surviving on the margins due to years of deprivation have sunk further, and the children of such families have recourse to no nutrition, no health care, no education, no present and no future. Those from less unfortunate backgrounds are now suffering because the family wage earner has been killed, detained, or lost employment. Or the source of the family's income, a shop, factory or farm have been destroyed, or simply because it is impossible to feed a family under the existing economic conditions of high costs and low to nil income in Iraq.

As execrable as the current situation is for Iraqi children, most of the world media, appallingly, does not see it as a story to be covered. Even back in November 2004, surveys conducted by the UN, aid agencies and the interim Iraqi government showed that acute malnutrition among young children had nearly doubled since the US-led invasion took place in the spring of 2004.

A Washington Post story, "Children Pay Cost of Iraq's Chaos," read, "After the rate of acute malnutrition among children younger than 5 steadily declined to 4 percent two years ago, it shot up to 7.7 percent this year, according to a study conducted by Iraq's Health Ministry in cooperation with Norway's Institute for Applied International Studies and the U.N. Development Program. The new figure translates to roughly 400,000 Iraqi children suffering from "wasting," a condition characterized by chronic diarrhea and dangerous deficiencies of protein."

Not only is the US occupation starving Iraq's children, but occupation forces regularly detain them as well. It is common knowledge in Iraq that there have been child prisoners in the most odious prisons, such as Abu Ghraib, since early on in the occupation. While most, if not all, corporate media outlets in the US have been loath to visit the subject, the Sunday Herald in Scotland reported back in August 2004 that "coalition forces are holding more than 100 children in jails such as Abu Ghraib. Witnesses claim that the detainees - some as young as 10 - are also being subjected to rape and torture."

The story read, "It was early last October that Kasim Mehaddi Hilas says he witnessed the rape of a boy prisoner aged about 15 in the notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. 'The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets,' he said in a statement given to investigators probing prisoner abuse in Abu Ghraib. 'Then, when I heard the screaming I climbed the door … and I saw [the soldier's name is deleted] who was wearing a military uniform." Hilas, who was himself threatened with being sexually assaulted in Abu Ghraib, then described in horrific detail how the soldier raped 'the little kid.'"

The newspaper's investigation at that time concluded that there were as many as 107 children being held by occupation forces, although their names were not known, nor their location or the length of their detention.

In June 2004 an internal UNICEF report, which was not made public, noted widespread arrest and detention of Iraqi children by US and UK forces. A section of the report titled "Children in Conflict with the Law or with Coalition Forces," stated, "In July and August 2003, several meetings were conducted with CPA (Coalition Provisional Authority) … and Ministry of Justice to address issues related to juvenile justice and the situation of children detained by the coalition forces … UNICEF is working through a variety of channels to try and learn more about conditions for children who are imprisoned or detained, and to ensure that their rights are respected."

Another section of the report added, "Information on the number, age, gender and conditions of incarceration is limited. In Basra and Karbala children arrested for alleged activities targeting the occupying forces are reported to be routinely transferred to an internee facility in Um Qasr. The categorization of these children as 'internees' is worrying since it implies indefinite holding without contact with family, expectation of trial or due process." The report went on to add, "A detention centre for children was established in Baghdad, where according to ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross) a significant number of children were detained. UNICEF was informed that the coalition forces were planning to transfer all children in adult facilities to this 'specialized' child detention centre. In July 2003, UNICEF requested a visit to the centre but access was denied. Poor security in the area of the detention centre has prevented visits by independent observers like the ICRC since last December [2003]."

A section of the report which I found very pertinent, as I'd already witnessed this occurring in Iraq, stated, "The perceived unjust detention of Iraqi males, including youths, for suspected activities against the occupying forces has become one of the leading causes for the mounting frustration among Iraqi youth and the potential for radicalization of this population group."

On December 17, 2003, at the al-Shahid Adnan Kherala secondary school in Baghdad, I witnessed US forces detain 16 children who had held a mock, non-violent, pro-Saddam Hussein the previous day. While forces from the First Armored Division sealed the school with two large tanks, helicopters, several Bradley fighting vehicles and at least 10 Humvees, soldiers loaded the children into a covered truck and drove them to their base. Meanwhile, the rest of the students remained locked inside the school until the US military began to exit the area.

Shortly thereafter the doors were unlocked, releasing the frightened students who flocked out the doors. The youngest were 12 years old, and none of the students were older than 18. They ran out, many in tears, while others were enraged as they kicked and shook the front gate. My interpreter and I were surrounded by frenzied students who yelled, "This is the democracy? This is the freedom? You see what the Americans are doing to us here?"

Another student cried out to us, "They took several of my friends! Why are they taking them to prison? For throwing rocks?" A few blocks away we spoke with a smaller group of students who had run from the school (in panic). One student who was crying yelled to me, "Why are they doing this to us? We are only kids!"

The tanks and Bradley fighting vehicles that were guarding the perimeter of the school began to rumble down the street beside us, on their passage out. Several young boys with tears streaming down their faces picked up stones and hurled them at the tanks as they drove by. Imagine my horror when I saw the US soldiers on top of the Bradleys begin firing their M-16's above our heads as we ducked inside a taxi. A soldier on another Bradley, behind the first, passed and fired randomly above our heads as well. Kids and pedestrians ran for cover into the shops and wherever possible.

I remember a little boy, not more than 13 years old, holding a stone and standing at the edge of the street glaring at the Bradleys as they rumbled past. Another soldier riding atop another passing Bradley pulled out his pistol and aimed it at the boy's head and kept him in his sights until the vehicle rolled out of sight.

One of the students hiding behind our taxi screamed to me, "Who are the terrorists here now? You have seen this yourself! We are school kids!"

The very next month, in January 2004, I was in an area on the outskirts of Baghdad that had been pulverized by "Operation Iron Grip." I spoke with a man at his small farm house. His three year old boy, Halaf Ziad Halaf, walked up to me and with a worried look on his face said, "I have seen the Americans here with their tanks. They want to attack us."

His uncle, who had joined us for tea, leaned over to me and said, "The Americans are creating the terrorists here by hurting people and causing their relatives to fight against them. Even this little boy will grow up hating the Americans because of their policy here."

The slaughter, starvation, detention, torture and sexual assault of Iraq's children at the hands of US soldiers or by proxy via US foreign policy, is not a recent phenomenon. It is true that the present US administration has been brazen and blatant in its crimes in Iraq, but those willing to bear witness must not forget that Bill Clinton and his minions played an equally, if not even more devastating role in the assault on the children of Iraq.

On May 12, 1996, Clinton's Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was asked by Lesley Stahl on "60 Minutes" about the effects of US sanctions against Iraq, "We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?"

In a response which has now become notorious, Albright replied, "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price - we think the price is worth it."

We are guilty of many errors and many faults but our worst crime is abandoning the children, neglecting the fountain of life. Many of the things we need can wait. The child cannot. Right now is the time his bones are being formed, his blood is being made, and his senses are being developed. To him we cannot answer "Tomorrow." His name is "Today."
- Gabriela Mistral

To all Americans who, despite voluminous evidence to the contrary, continue to believe that they are supporting a war for democracy in Iraq, I would like to say, the way Iraq is headed it will have little use for democracy and freedom. We must find ways to stop the immoral, soulless, repugnant occupation if we want the children of Iraq to see any future at all.


Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who spent over 8 months reporting from occupied Iraq. He presented evidence of US war crimes in Iraq at the International Commission of Inquiry on Crimes Against Humanity Committed by the Bush Administration in New York City in January 2006. He writes regularly for TruthOut, Inter Press Service, Asia Times and TomDispatch, and maintains his own web site, dahrjamailiraq.com.

akermanp@dailytelegraph.com.au IS ONE F'ed UP PERSON

People like this sicken me.



Flawed ideology comes to grief

May 23, 2006

CINDY Sheehan, pin-up girl for the loopy Left, global terrorists, and the anti-US, anti-Howard, anti-Iraq war push, is entertaining her addled fans in Sydney tonight.

It should be enlightening – not.

Using her soldier son Casey's coffin as a soapbox, Sheehan has become a counter-culture celebrity in the US, best-known for camping outside President George W. Bush's ranch and the White House and making herself available to the liberal media 24/7.

Expect to see her interviewed at length in the Fairfax Press and by the ABC's numerous competing news and current affairs programs.

Don't expect however to see any of the tough questions put to her.

Sheehan has been shrilly exploiting her son Casey's death for the past two years but her rambling monologues rarely reflect the reality that the former altar boy, Eagle Scout and church youth group leader was also a volunteer with the US Army's 1st battalion, 82nd field artillery regiment in Iraq in 2004 when he was killed.

Indeed, Cindy has herself been quoted in left-wing journals as saying her son told her: "Mom, this is what we trained for. I'm ready. It's my job. Because the sooner I get there, the sooner I'll come home."

Further, Casey Sheehan not only joined the military voluntarily in May, 2000, but when he also voluntarily re-enlisted in 2003, he was fully aware that he was most likely going to serve in Iraq.

And, as other heroic and conscientious soldiers have done throughout history, he selflessly died in an action he need not have been involved in, attempting to rescue friends caught in a firefight.

As Cindy Sheehan herself acknowledges, his sergeant said "Sheehan you don't have to go," because he was a mechanic, and, again according to Cindy, her son said: "Where my chief goes, I go."

With her callous desire to paint every aspect of the US involvement in the Iraq war as evil, Cindy Sheehan even claimed of her son's desire to volunteer for a rescue mission that he "and 20 of his buddies were sent into a raging insurgent uprising to rescue wounded soldiers".

Given Casey's decision to enlist, re-enlist and volunteer for a dangerous mercy mission, it seems unlikely that he would have warmed to either this characterisation or the manner in which his mother has so enthusiastically embraced a broad coalition of left-wing American groups including the Malcolm X Grassroots Organisation (which proudly labels those convicted of the murder of police officers as "political prisoners"), the International Socialist Organisation, or Code Pink, a group which sent money to those fighting US troops in the terrorist-held city of Fallujah.

For Cindy, who has claimed her son was "murdered . . . for lies and a NeoCon agenda to benefit Israel", giving terrorists and their supporters a boost has become something of a habit.

She has also praised "civil rights" lawyer Lynne Stewart who was convicted on five counts of passing on messages for her client, the notorious terrorist Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, also known as the Blind Bomber, who was jailed for his role in the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing, to his evil accomplices in Egypt.

In fact a study of her web journal and reported remarks indicates that she is prone to taking one position one day, and a contrary position the next.

Thus, after first meeting President Bush in 2004, she said she found him to be a man of compassion, "sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis . . . I know he's sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he is a man of faith."

Now, of course, she has radically recanted and believes her family's meeting with Bush was one of the most disgusting experiences of her life.

In our country she enjoys the support of lesser lights of the international Left like the Greens, Fair Go for Palestine, the Stop the War Coalition, the Evatt Foundation, the Medical Association for the Prevention of War (Australia), and Stop the War Coalition Sydney, the Medical Association for the Prevention of War and Sydney University's whacky Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies.

Cindy Sheehan will probably receive a warmer welcome from the disaffected Left who attend her public meetings in Sydney and Melbourne this week than she would if she visited members of her late son's family.

Last year, her husband Patrick was in the process of divorcing her and Casey's aunt and godmother Cherie Quarterolo released a statement on behalf of Casey's distressed grandparents, aunts, uncles and numerous cousins distancing them from Cindy's public posturing.

"The Sheehan family lost our beloved Casey in the Iraq War and we have been silently, respectfully grieving," the statement read.

"We do not agree with the political motivations and publicity tactics of Cindy Sheehan. She appears to be promoting her own agenda and notoriety at the expense of her son's good name and reputation.

The rest of the Sheehan family supports the troops, our country, and our President, silently, with prayer and respect."

Cindy Sheehan is fortunate that she is visiting Australia, a generous, hospitable and freedom-loving nation, not unlike her own, and not a country controlled by the terrorists who would gain the most should our troops – or America's – cut and run from Iraq as she and supporters would like.

It is only countries like ours in which intolerant ideologues like her are tolerated.

akermanp@dailytelegraph.com.au

I had to email them and stand up for my friend Cindy Sheehan.

You sure are filled with hate! People like you are the reason why we are killing and torturing so many people, because you live in fear.


You are one F'ed up person! I'm proud of my friends Cindy Sheehan, Carlos Arredondo and all the other parents who are standing up to the killing machine of our government for the greed of power and money. And most of the country stand with them also. It's people like you who bring our country down!

Divided we stand
Cindy


Melida Arredondo also emailed this person and forwarded me a copy


Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 13:36:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Melida Arredondo Subject: When you know grief, you may judge grief To: letters@dailytelegraph.com.au CC: akermanp@dailytelegraph.com.au
To the editor of the Daily Telegraph:
This letter is directed to the writer of the story "Flawed Ideology Comes to Grief."
Madam or Sir, have you ever had a child die? Have you ever had a child die violently be it from a murder or during warfare? Have you ever had to hear day in and day out how other kids just like your own are dying the same way without any end in sight?
If not, I find your deep insight into the psyche of Cindy Sheehan as someone whose "remarks indicate that she is prone to taking one position one day, and a contrary position the next" not just an indicator of a lack of compassion but also truly judgemental.
The whole world had been provided different information as to why the war in Iraq began in 2003 versus the knowledge that exists today. The US president and journalists knew this knowledge prior to re-election. The American public did not.
However, per your analysis of Cindy Sheehan's mindset, "she has radically recanted and believes her family's meeting with Bush was one of the most disgusting experiences of her life." Government lies have been exposed publicly yet US fellow countrymen excuse those in executive power from any culpability. Those lies have led to 2459 US deaths just like Cindy's child. This is maddening to anyone but, Cindy's level of grieving and loss are incomprehendible. If anything, she is channeling her grief into peace.
For a war parent, the loss does not end. It's not like a broken leg. The goal of "recuperation from grief" is to somehow learn to live without a very essential piece of one's puzzle. I describe such grief as similar to losing a leg. Often the person feels phantom pains forever. However, that person may learn to walk, even run and do many of the things a two legged person can do. Yet, that pain lingers inexplicably. The brain does not comprehend.
Perhaps its because your own perspective is jaded. My guess is you have not experienced a similar trauma, have no empathy and no experience writing on this topic. You believe that there must be some political motivation to Cindy's actions. You do not comprehend Cindy's loss of a son and, indeed, her whole life as she knew it. Casey volunteered not just to fight but also to defend the freedom's that his Mother is exercising.
Semper pax, Melida Arredondo, Roslindale, Massachusetts


UPDATE: I received a return email from this person

Cindy: I don't live in fear. I am a community volunteer, I am listed in the telephone book, I walk openly where I wish to. Why would you think I am afraid? I don't hate. Why are you so angry? I suggest you get some psychological assistance before you harm yourself or others. Best wishes Piers Akerman

Piers - You are afraid. Anyone who would slam a mother who's son was murdered by her government is afraid. You buy into the "terrorist are out to get you" theory. Thus, you live in fear.

Don't lie to yourself. You are full of hate. Anyone that writes crap like you wrote
"CINDY Sheehan, pin-up girl for the loopy Left, global terrorists, and the anti-US, anti-Howard, anti-Iraq war push, is entertaining her addled fans in Sydney tonight.It should be enlightening – not." is full of hate. To say things you did about a woman who you don't know, who you have only read about is full of hate. And, I have to say, you got a lot wrong about my friend. You better check your facts. Stop listening to the killing neocons. They make up more stories about people, oh wait, you are a neocon, aren't you? Yeah you are because only the neocons are hateful-hurtful people who say vile things about other people who they don't know to make themselves feel better.

I am angry because people like you spread lies to flame the killing machine. How much death is OK with you? Cindy Sheehan, Carlos and Melida Arredondo are standing up fighting so that other children like theirs aren't murdered. Melida also sent you an email. Her husband, my neighbor blew up the government van when they brought the news of his son's Alex's death on his birthday. When you live in their shoes you can write such hateful things about another parent, until then, keep your oppinion of Cindy and others like her to yourself.

Thank GOD your not in this country. We have enough of your kind here.
May peace beinside all of us,
Cindy

UPDATE AGAIN:


Cindy: Get a life! Eighty eight Australian kids were killed when they were on holiday in Bali. Not even in a war. Just holidaying, they were killed by people who Cindy Sheehan and her lunatic followers have supported. Am I afraid? Only of idiots who haven�t a clue of what goes on beyond the limits of their own comfort zones. Peace be with you, Piers Akerman



See, you are filled with hate!

Like I said, you are one FUCKED UP PERSON!

I have a life- thank you very much. More than I can say about my friend Carlos. His and others like him will never be the same because of your hate and fear.

All these emails are getting posted on my blog and being sent to Gold Star Families. Want to send me more?

Divided We Stand
Cindy

UPDATE: Another email

Cindy

I do hope you hope these responses on your blog because they illustrate the utter mendacity of your mindless movement.

I am amused by your resorting to gutter language and the defence of those who oppose liberty, equality and freedom for others. Please disseminate this as widely as possible.

Best wishes

Piers Akerman


Piers - Ah, you didn't get that I called you Fucked up in my first email.
You are heartless. Like I said, THANK GOD you live there and not here.
I, Cindy Sheehan, Carlos Arredondo and others like us are the meaning of liberty, equality and freedom. We fight for it everyday. You on the other hand can only write vile things about a good person. Both of our true colors are showing. Yours filled with hate and condoning killing, mine fighting for my friends and life of others and truth.

I hope you find some love in your heart for other humans before it destroys you.

Now, Go away - play with others. I'm done with your nonsense.
Cindy





****************************

Do you know how many today as you go about your day?
2,456

U.S. Marine Killed in Western Iraq Associated Press BAGHDAD, Iraq - A U.S. Marine was killed in action in Iraq's volatile western Anbar province, the U.S. Command said Monday. The Marine, assigned to Regimental Combat Team 5, died Sunday but gave no further details. The Marine's name was withheld pending notification of relatives.


Sunday, May 21, 2006

Protest Music Good For The Soul

I have to say, I love all the new protest music coming out. I knew it would happen. It just took a long time for the passion to hit the hearts of the artist. How long will it take to hit the hearts of the public to force themselves into action. Do you know how many will die today while you go about your day? I've had enough. My voice alone is nothing but all of our voices together is America, OUR COUNTRY! When will we stand up and do the right thing? We all know killing and torture is wrong - why do we do it anyway? Because of fear......

May peace be inside all of us,
Cindy


Protest music takes a bow

George W. Bush's approval ratings might be plummeting, but the president still has his loyalists. Chief among them are the Right Brothers, a Nashville rock band making the Internet rounds with a catchy song called "Bush Was Right."

The tune, recorded last year, is built on an uptempo pop-rock arrangement similar to Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire," over which the Right Brothers lay out a defense of Bush's foreign and economic policies ("Revenue is going up / can you say tax cuts?"), leading up to the titular chorus, "Bush was right!" And while they're at it, they include a roll call of shame:

Ted Kennedy -- wrong!

Cindy Sheehan -- wrong!

France -- wrong!

If the Right Brothers were recording "Bush Was Right" today, they'd probably expand their list of the wrong-minded. Pink, whose latest album includes a scathing folk song with the Indigo Girls called "Dear Mr. President," would probably be there. So would the Dixie Chicks, whose unrepentant attitude is summed up by a song title on their new album: "Not Ready to Make Nice." Or Jackson Browne, whose mid-'80s song "Lives in the Balance" has been turned into an updated video with images from the war in Iraq (www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11924.htm).

But the two names most likely to be there are Neil Young and Pearl Jam, whose latest albums take dead aim at the Bush administration: Young's "Living With War" on Reprise Records and Pearl Jam's eponymous release on J Records.

The coincidence of the albums' releases brings to mind Neil Young's stellar 1995 album, "Mirror Ball," which featured Pearl Jam. The link to the new releases isn't a matter of politics but quality. Since "Mirror Ball," both acts have had periods where they seemed to lose the thread.

Young's music got flabby and unfocused on 1996's "Broken Arrow." He sounded complacent on 2000's "Silver & Gold" and deadly dull on 2002's undercooked "Are You Passionate?" Signs of life returned with 2003's rough-hewn "Greendale" and last year's soft-spoken "Prairie Wind," made under the shadow of Young's near-death from an aneurysm. But that left fans wondering whether the 60-year-old Young had much rock left in the tank.

Pearl Jam, meanwhile, spent the mid-1990s locked in an ugly spat with Ticketmaster, which limited its touring for years. A series of increasingly dense, difficult albums further shrank the band's audience. By the turn of the century, Pearl Jam had evolved into a grunge equivalent of the Grateful Dead -- playing to a large cult audience, but increasingly irrelevant to the mainstream.

Now, both Young and Pearl Jam have regained their sense of purpose. Part of the energy comes from current events, but part of it comes from reconnecting with the rock-first-and-think-later immediacy that made both acts great in the first place.

'Metal folk protest'

Young recently told Rolling Stone that one of the inspirations for "Living With War" came in late March, when he saw a USA Today photo of a military cargo plane that had been turned into a flying hospital. The photo's publication followed a strong nudge earlier that month at South by Southwest, the music-industry convention in Austin, Texas.

Young served as keynote speaker to promote his new concert movie, "Heart of Gold." South by Southwest managing director Roland Swenson, making the introduction, declared, "We need another 'Ohio,' " a reference to Young's Vietnam War-era protest song about the 1970 shootings at Kent State University.

Six weeks later, "Living With War" was in stores.

"I didn't mean to put him on the spot," Swenson says now. "I was just trying to talk about why I admired him and to show how powerful music can be. Then, after it was over, I was kind of freaking out: 'Oh my gosh, I just challenged Neil Young. What was I thinking?' But here it is, although I don't want to take any credit and I certainly don't deserve any."

Young describes "Living With War" as "metal folk protest." Packaged in a plain brown wrapper, "Living With War" seems less like a record than a collection of protest songs to chant at a rally. As such, it will probably have the shelf life of a "Daily Show" episode. But rushing the album was definitely the right thing to do.

"Living With War" plays out as a Pete Seeger-style sing-along, set to Young's electric-guitar squall and cheesy trumpet (credited to the aptly named Tommy Bray). Throw in a 100-voice choir and presto: Kumbaya.

Young doesn't do that song, or "We Shall Overcome." But "Living With War" does close with an a cappella version of "America the Beautiful." The effect is similar to "The Deer Hunter," director Michael Cimino's wrenching 1979 Vietnam film, which closed with the cast singing "God Bless America." It sounds a note of reconciliation, holding out hope for better times ahead.

First, though, we have to get through the present. "After the Garden" opens "Living With War" with, "Won't need no shadow man / Runnin' the government / Won't need no stinkin' war." "Shock and Awe" describes the Iraq war as a hopeless quagmire with no winners. And "Flags of Freedom" has the unforgettable image of a young man marching off to war as his sister watches, wearing headphones, "Listenin' to Bob Dylan singin' in 1963."

The song getting the most attention is "Let's Impeach the President." It has a feel similar to 1979's "Powderfinger," in which Young described being a combat casualty with heartbreaking pathos ("Then I saw black / And my face splashed in the sky"). But where "Powderfinger" was reportorial, "Let's Impeach the President" aims to provoke. It starts off with a trumpet playing Taps and concludes with sound bites of President Bush as the choir chants, "Flip flop."

No surprise that Fox News attacked "Let's Impeach the President" before the song was even available. Writing on the Fox Web site last month, commentator John Gibson said of Young and Pink, "They are forgetful. They have amnesia. They blame the wrong leaders. They are proud of their opposition. And they couldn't be more wrong."

Rock the mainstream

A self-titled album implies an attempted rejuvenation, and "Pearl Jam" accomplishes that feat. The album even got Pearl Jam back on "Saturday Night Live" for the first time since 1994, an April 15 performance most notable in that lead singer Eddie Vedder looked and sounded as though the last 12 years had never happened.

After years of half-successful tangents, "Pearl Jam" is the group's attempt to reclaim the center by rocking the house. It's the band's equivalent of U2's "All That You Can't Leave Behind," a back-to-basics move that should remind everyone why Pearl Jam was worth paying attention to in the first place.

Although not as politically direct as Young's album, "Pearl Jam" fires plenty of salvos at the Bush administration. "World Wide Suicide" speaks of a dead soldier, "A handsome face that the president took for granted / Writing checks that others pay." "Army Reserve" evokes the families of troops serving in Iraq, and "Marker in the Sand" decries those who are "killing in God's name."

Apart from a few quieter numbers, most of the 13 songs are terrific riff-rock that would have fit right in on "Ten" or "Vs.," the twin peaks of Pearl Jam's early-'90s dominance. Perhaps more important, the album has put Pearl Jam back into the center of the cultural conversation at a time when the band's political views seem more mainstream by the day.

"Pearl Jam" has been noncontroversial enough for Vedder to throw out the first pitch and sing "Take Me Out to the Ballgame" at a Cubs baseball game in Chicago last weekend. One of Pearl Jam's few appearances on the opinion pages this year was a relatively flattering mention in the comic strip "Doonesbury." Told that she can spend the summer following Pearl Jam on tour, teenage Alex Doonesbury gushes, "Why, yes! And they've stopped sucking! Perfect!"

Perfect, yes.

Friday, May 19, 2006

Florida Will Do ANYTHING To Take Your Vote Away

Do you know how many today as you go about your day?
2,453
How much is enough with you?


A New Election Lawsuit in Florida

The League of Women Voters claims a new state law will unlawfully depress voter registration

The League of Women Voters has been signing up voters ever since women won the right to vote in 1920. But now, for the first time in the League's storied history, a branch of the organization has shut down its operations to protest a new Florida law that the League claims will have a chilling effect on voter registration — in a state that already has one of the nation's most notoriously dysfunctional election systems.

In a federal lawsuit filed in Miami on Thursday against the Florida Secretary of State and Division of Elections, the League's Florida branch acknowledged that it had recently ceased efforts to register voters because of what it calls the law's draconian fines against organizations (other than political parties) for submitting forms late. The League of Women Voters of Florida joined several other pubic interest and labor groups, including the Florida AFL-CIO, in challenging the constitutionality of the law, which went into effect Jan. 1. They are asking the U.S. District Court to immediately suspend the fines — which the groups say could bankrupt their voter registration budgets.

As the lawsuit puts it, "the challenged law imposes civil fines of $250 for each voter registration application submitted more than 10 days after it is collected, $500 for each application submitted after any voter registration deadline, and $5,000 for each application [that for whatever reason doesn't end up being] submitted. Plaintiffs are strictly liable for these fines, even if their inability to meet the statutory deadlines results from events beyond their control, such as the destruction of applications in a hurricane."

On March 19 the board of directors for LWV of Florida voted unanimously to suspend voter registration rather than put its volunteers and $80,000 annual budget at risk, says its president, Dianne Wheatley-Giliotti. "I'm angry, okay?" Wheatley-Giliotti says. "This hits at the core of our mission. We were founded to educate voters and get them involved in the political process. I can't do my job, really."

Florida is the only state that levies fines for submitting registration applications late or not at all, says Wendy Weiser of the Brennan Center for Justice at the NYU School of Law, who also represents the plaintiffs. And the LWV of Florida claims the impact of the fines could be devastating. "The League of Women Voters' entire annual budget of $80,000 would be decimated if only sixteen voter registration applications collected by its volunteers were lost in a flood, or if its volunteers took 11 days to submit the few hundred applications they often collect during one day's work," according to the lawsuit.

Contacted shortly after the filing in Miami, Susan Smith, spokeswoman for the Florida Department of State in Tallahassee said the agency had not yet seen the lawsuit and therefore could not comment. Other voter registration advocates say they also fear that one of the underlying political intents of the law — which was passed by the Republican-majority Florida Legislature — is to dilute and discourage Democratic voter registration, since groups like the AFL-CIO are thought to register more working-class and minority voters.

Sen. Bill Posey, a Rockledge Republican, argues that hurricanes or other disasters are not the issue; by imposing the fine for failing to submit a voter's application, he maintains, the law discourages people or groups from destroying the registration forms of people with differing political views. (Weiser points out that Florida already had a law on the books to address that problem.) And if a hurricane hits, any fine due to delay or destruction can be appealed, he says. "If a hurricane blew a building away, I can't imagine they're going to get somebody for that," Posey says. "I think common sense would prevail. If there is a nuclear holocaust I think the last thing people are going to be worried about is getting their registrations in on time."

State Rep. Ron Reagan (no relation to the former President), a Sarasota Republican who sponsored the law, says political parties are exempt from the law "because we rarely have a problem with political parties. It didn't matter what side you were on. We were not going to penalize them." But Weiser of the Brennan Center calls that position "discriminatory. The League of Women Voters and AFL-CIO have been forced to shut down their operations. It's not only burdensome but discriminatory. That's problematic — and unconstitutional."

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Our First Lost Freedom - Having Your Vote Counted

Do you know how many today as you go about your day?
2,447 is enough!


Go to Original

More E-voting Concerns Surface With State Primaries Underway
By Catherine Komp
The NewStandard Wednesday 17 May 2006 With another election season around the corner, activists are concerned that electronic voting machines supplied by a handful of American corporations are bug-ridden and easily tampered with, but the road to redress is rough and windy. From serious security flaws that could allow hackers easy access to electronic voting systems, to routine computer malfunctions and undelivered software, state and local officials are one-by-one joining voter-access groups and computer scientists in questioning the reliability of the three major suppliers of electronic voting machines. The latest security flaw to be uncovered affects thousands of Diebold touch-screen voting machines across the country. Computer scientist Michael Shamos, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University and one of the examiners that tested several companies' machines in Pennsylvania, described the defect as a "misfeature" originally designed by Diebold to let field technicians update machine software quickly. But, he said, it also would permit someone to upload their own software onto a voting machine with the aim of tampering with election results. Shamos said the problem is the "biggest we've ever seen." Pennsylvania's primary was Tuesday and Shamos said he would be at the polls monitoring the electronic tabulations. Last week, voter-access group Black Box Voting (BBV) released the report of Finnish computer scientist Harri Hursti, who discovered the "back door" into Diebold touch-screen systems earlier this spring when examining machines in Emery County, Utah. Bruce Funk, an Emery County clerk of 23 years, had sought independent analysis of his county's machines after he discovered numerous problems and was unsatisfied with Diebold's response. While this newly exposed security flaw is serious, Shamos said he is not at all surprised because Diebold has "a history of not paying attention to security." "They just don't get it," Shamos told The NewStandard. "We've had many, many, many discussions. In fact, if you look at their public statements they've made in light of this revelation, it shows that they still don't get it." While Diebold admits the system is faulty, the company is emphasizing that a human element is needed to compromise an election. Though TNS could not reach Diebold for an interview, spokesperson David Bear told the New York Times: "For there to be a problem here, you're basically assuming a premise where you have some evil and nefarious election officials who would sneak in and introduce a piece of software. I don't believe these evil elections people exist." Shamos said the long-term fix is to force Diebold to overhaul its machines to make them more secure. Upon the urgings of Shamos and other machine examiners, the Pennsylvania elections officials directed precincts to minimize security breaches by locking up machines until Election Day. Though these machines are used in numerous states, only California and Iowa, in addition to Pennsylvania, have addressed the problem. Some officials are implementing new administrative rules to compensate for the flaw, for example increasing security where machines are stored and reinstalling software immediately before the election. John Hedgecoth, deputy secretary of state in Iowa, told TNS his office instructed elections officials in the state's 99 counties to upload a final version of the software into their machines just before Election Day and then seal the machine with the memory card in it. "So we are controlling both the software in the field with a final version that is decided upon by our elections division, and then we're securing the memory card against tampering on Election Day," he said. Hedgecoth says the industry could be making better machines that are less vulnerable, but he does not believe governments are letting companies off the hook. "Asking a vendor to provide a system that is not susceptible to any conceivable technological attack is unrealistic and we have to recognize that, and I think those of us who work on the government side of this understand that," Hedgecoth said. Some government officials have concerns other than just the poor construction of electronic voting machines. In preparation for West Virginia's primary earlier this month, Election Systems & Software (ES&S) failed to meet its deadline for delivering "programmable ballots" needed to administer the election in all 55 counties. According to Ben Beakes, chief of staff for Secretary of State Betty Ireland, six counties were not able to use the electronic machines they purchased because they could not test their machines before the May 9 election. "It created an undue stress and anxiety on the clerks and county election officials throughout the state," Beakes said. "We venture to say that this was the toughest election to prepare for in many years… due to the fact that most counties were not able to adequately prepare and familiarize themselves with the new equipment used in the primary election." In a complaint filed with the US Election Assistance Commission (EAC), Secretary Ireland accuses ES&S of "vast delays" and "broken promises." She also said the problems are not restricted to West Virginia. Acknowledging that the EAC "probably has no authority to investigate and penalize" the company, Ireland wrote that she has also contacted the state attorney general and the US Justice Department. Sources interviewed by TNS for this story could not say who exactly is responsible for investigating e-voting companies when there are problems. Because each state has individualized contracts with the manufacturers, officials would likely need to address breaches of that contract with the state attorney general. Some voters in Arizona, where primaries are not scheduled until September, are hoping a lawsuit will prevent the problems they are seeing in other states. Four plaintiffs have filed suit against Secretary of State Jan Brewer and numerous county officials to stop the implementation of touch-screen machines produced by Diebold and Sequoia Voting Systems, saying the state is wasting millions of dollars on machines that "are not trustworthy or transparent." The lawsuit claims that both Diebold and Sequoia machines fail to meet state and federal regulations, including disability access standards and state certification. It also argues that despite federal Voluntary Voting System Standards which prohibit the use of "interpretable code" - a type of code that lead to the successful hacking tests conducted by Hursti - and despite knowing about the vulnerabilities of this code, Diebold has failed to change its voting systems. The lawsuit was filed with the help of Voter Action, a nonprofit voting-access advocacy group, on the heels of similar suits in California, New York and New Mexico brought by the organization on behalf of voters. It cites problems with unusually high numbers of "undervotes" - cases in which a ballot does not record a vote - in the 2004 New Mexico elections on ballots supposedly cast on DRE machines. It also lists lost votes, switched votes and "phantom votes" as serious concerns documented during the same election in New Mexico. Plaintiffs in Arizona want the state to drop the use of all touch-screen machines in favor of paper ballots that can be scanned and tabulated electronically, as was mandated by neighboring New Mexico's legislature. On the other side of the country, Maryland Governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., along with the entire Maryland House of Delegates, wants to suspend using the Diebold machines on which the state spent $90 million. Maryland's senate, however, failed to vote on the measure. Holly Jacobson, co-director of Voter Action, believes paper balloting is the only verifiable way to ensure elections are accurate. In a press statement she said, "Our elections are too important to turn over to private corporations operating with no accountability and to electronic voting systems with a history of errors and security problems."

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Mothers Say NO MORE WAR

I really do wish I could have gone to DC for mothers day. I stand united with all the mothers who don't want to kill any more of our children. A Mothers Love is the kind of love we all need to feel inside to allow for peace to happen. Until we all have love inside we will never have peace all around.

Please watch the video's from Mothers Day in DC
Enjoy your moments
Cindy

VIDEO

Mother's Day Call for Peace
A Report by Geoffrey Millard and Scott Galindez

Hundreds of mothers, some with their children while others were mourning the loss of theirs, spent this Mother's Day in Washington, DC, calling for an end to the war in Iraq. TruthOut's Geoffrey Millard and Scott Galindez were there.

QuickTime
DSL | 56K
Windows Media
DSL | 56K
RealMedia
DSL | 56K
VIDEO

Silent March Honors the Fallen
A Report by Scott Galindez

On Saturday, May 13th, a silent march was held on the National Mall in Washingon, DC. Family members of soldiers who have died in Iraq were joined by families of those currently serving and Iraq War veterans who now oppose the war. The event was held in conjunction with a display of boots for every soldier who has died in Iraq.

QuickTime
DSL | 56K
Windows Media
DSL | 56K
RealMedia
DSL | 56K
VIDEO

Mothers Say No to War
A Report by Geoffrey Millard and Scott Galindez

Code Pink has launched a 24-hour Mother's Day peace vigil in front of the White House. Participants include Susan Sarandon, Cindy Sheehan, Ann Wright, Patch Adams, and Medea Benjamin. TruthOut's Geoffrey Millard and Scott Galindez filed this report from Washington, DC.

QuickTime
DSL | 56K
Windows Media
DSL | 56K
RealMedia
DSL | 56K
VIDEO

A Somber Mother's Day Weekend in DC
A Report by Geoffrey Millard and Scott Galindez

This Mother's Day will not be a time of joy for the almost 2,500 mothers who have lost their son or daughter in Iraq. Many of those mothers will be in Washington, DC, participating in a weekend full of activities ranging from a silent march to a 24-hour vigil. TruthOut's Geoffrey Millard and Scott Galindez are in Washington and will be sending in video reports throughout the weekend.

QuickTime
DSL | 56K
Windows Media
DSL | 56K
RealMedia
DSL | 56K

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Carlos Arredondo and others in DC for Mothers Day


Carlos Arredondo holds a portrait of his son during an anti-Iraqi war rally outside the White House in Washington May 13, 2006. Arredondo's son, U.S. Marine Cpl. Alexander Arredondo was killed in Najaf by a sniper in August 2004. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas


Carlos Arredondo pulls a flag-draped coffin during a march against the war in Iraq Saturday, May 13, 2006 on the National Mall in Washington. Arredondo's son, U. S. Marine Cpl. Alexander Arredondo of Boston, Mass., was killed in Najaf by a sniper August 24, 2004. Carlos Arredondo is an immigrant seeking citizenship in the United States. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)


Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan, center, hugs Nina Utne, right, as dusk falls at a peace demonstration sponsored by Code Pink in Lafayette Park across from the White House in Washington, Saturday, May 13, 2006. Often referred to as the 'peace mom', Sheehan became a prominent anti-Iraq war protester after the death of her son Casey Sheehan who was serving in the US military in Iraq. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)


A photograph of Casey Sheehan, the son of Cindy Sheehan, is seen at an anti-war protest Saturday, May 13, 2006 on the National Mall in Washington. Army Specialist Casey Sheehan, 24, was killed in Baghdad April 4, 2004. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)


Flag-draped coffins are displayed by anti-Iraqi war protesters on the Ellipse near the White House in Washington May 13, 2006. Mothers and peace activists gather to call for an end to the war in Iraq and stand against a military attack on Iran. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas


Anti-Iraqi war protesters march outside of the White House in Washington May 13, 2006. Mothers and peace activists gather to call for an end to the war in Iraq and stand against a military attack on Iran. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas


Iraq War veteran, Army soldier David Adams of Carbondale, Ill., becomes emotional as he speaks about the death of a comrade - which caused him to question the Iraq War - during a peace rally Saturday, May 13, 2006 on the National Mall in Washington. Other members of Iraq Veterans Against the War console him. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)


Denise Thomas, from Georgia, joins protesters during an anti-war rally and march on the National Mall, Saturday, May 13, 2006, in Washington. Thomas has a daughter in the Army reserve who has already done one tour in Iraq and expects to go back. (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)
**********************************

Mothers protest Iraq war at White House

A group of mothers led by prominent war opponent Cindy Sheehan, who lost her soldier son in Iraq, started a 24-hour vigil outside the White House to protest the war in Iraq.

Actress Susan Sarandon was also expected to attend part of the demonstration Sunday, on Mother's Day. The protesters are calling for an end to the Iraq war and to express opposition to a military attack against Iran.

"I don't want any more moms to grieve for a child lost in this unjust, unnecessary war in Iraq," said Sheehan, who has become a leading war protesters since her 24-year-old sold was killed in Iraq.

"This Mother's Day we'll be outside the White House all day and all night demanding that our children come home from Iraq and not be sent to another reckless war in Iran," she said in a statement.

Women for Peace, made up of mothers and their families, met at 3:00 pm (1900 GMT) prepared to spend the night outside the White House before dispersing at the same time Sunday.

Sarandon was to attend from 1:00 to 4:00 pm on Sunday, when "organizers plan a dramatic action," according to the anti-war group Code Pink.

President George W. Bush will not be at the White House, but at the presidential weekend retreat at Camp David.

Events include a concert, film screenings, workshops on legislative strategies, writing letters to First Lady Laura Bush, a pink pajama party, an interfaith service on Sunday morning, and a visit to Walter Reed Army Medical Center to deliver roses to mothers and wives of injured soldiers, the group said.

Do you know how many today?

2,434 so we are told


4 Marines Killed in Iraq Tank Accident

Associated Press

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Four U.S. Marines died in Iraq when their tank rolled off a bridge into a canal and they drowned, the military said Friday.

The U.S. command said the deaths were not caused by hostile action.

The accident happened Thursday when the four Marines with Regimental Combat Team 5 were traveling in a U.S. M1A1 Main Battle Tank near Karmah, 50 miles west of Baghdad in Anbar Province. Many of Iraq's Sunni-led insurgent groups are based in the area.

The names of the deceased were being withheld pending notification of their relatives, and the accident was under investigation, the military said.

"We are a close-knit family and this loss affects us all," said Col. Larry D. Nicholson, commanding officer of Regimental Combat Team 5. "Our thoughts and prayers are with the families of these Marines during this difficult period."

Their deaths raised to at least 2,434 the number of members of the U.S. military who have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.

********************************

March 2004
My Thoughts Drift Away.....

It's a beautiful day,The lawn fills with smiling faces.
The sounds of years past delight my ears.
Dancing and singing and enjoying the day.
I look to the sky, my thoughts drift away.
How many will die today?

I think of all those who live in fear,
as I listen to the music and enjoy my beer.
Enjoying the day with all the smiling faces.
Do they know how many will die today?
While they partake the sounds of the past.
I look at their faces and realize they do not.
I mention to a friend my thoughts.

With tears running down, I look at the ground.
I pray for the souls that will be set free.
I pray for the mothers and fathers.
I pray for the brothers and sisters,
for the husbands and wives,
and for the daughters and sons.
All will have to live without their loved ones.

I try to enjoy the moment once more, but I cannot.
My soul cry's for all the death we have caused.
I pray for peace in all humans that we can enjoy our moments.
Precious moments we choose to blow away, forever.

By FloridaMom

Friday, May 12, 2006

Send a flower to the Mothers of the Fallen in DC for Mothers Day

Flower Power: Honor the mothers of the fallen with flowers.
This Mother’s Day (May 14), thousands of mothers will mark this occasion with a heavy heart — mothers whose children have been killed or wounded in the war in Iraq. Mothers from all over the country, including Cindy Sheehan and women from Iraq and Iran, will gather in front of the White House for a 24-hour-vigil to honor the war dead and demand an end to the war.

Say It with Flowers
What can you do? Send a Mother’s Day rose to Washington, D.C., and let the mothers of the fallen and wounded soldiers know that you stand with them and against the war. Organic roses will be presented to the mothers and tied to the fence outside the White House as a memorial to the dead and a call for peace.
Click here to send your flower or flowers